<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redundant Array of Inexpensive Clouds &#8211; Pt II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/</link>
	<description>Storage, Virtualisation &#38; Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:47:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Computing: Cloud Standardisation &#171; The Storage Architect</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Computing: Cloud Standardisation &#171; The Storage Architect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>[...] concept of evolving standardisation is extremely exciting.  Last year, I discussed RAIC (here and here) &#8211; the concept of using multiple clouds to form a redundant [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] concept of evolving standardisation is extremely exciting.  Last year, I discussed RAIC (here and here) &#8211; the concept of using multiple clouds to form a redundant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Computing: Cloud StandardisationcostExtendin &#171; The Storage Architect</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Computing: Cloud StandardisationcostExtendin &#171; The Storage Architect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-521</guid>
		<description>[...] concept of evolving standardisation is extremely exciting.  Last year, I discussed RAIC (here and here) &#8211; the concept of using multiple clouds to form a redundant [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] concept of evolving standardisation is extremely exciting.  Last year, I discussed RAIC (here and here) &#8211; the concept of using multiple clouds to form a redundant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Geoff,&lt;br/&gt;We haven&#039;t yet posted content on CloudArray, but will do so later this month on our corporate site: www.twinstrata.com. I&#039;m also going to be briefing Chris on the solution later this week. &lt;br/&gt;thanks,&lt;br/&gt;Craig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff,<br />We haven&#8217;t yet posted content on CloudArray, but will do so later this month on our corporate site: <a href="http://www.twinstrata.com"  rel="nofollow">http://www.twinstrata.com</a>. I&#8217;m also going to be briefing Chris on the solution later this week. <br />thanks,<br />Craig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Craig,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Do you have a website up and running where this concept (Cloud Array) is hashed out more? Would like to learn more about your solution in this context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,</p>
<p>Do you have a website up and running where this concept (Cloud Array) is hashed out more? Would like to learn more about your solution in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M Evans</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-517</guid>
		<description>Craig, yes  I would be very interested.  If you post a comment with your contact details and I will get hold of you from there (I won&#039;t publish the contact details comment)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, yes  I would be very interested.  If you post a comment with your contact details and I will get hold of you from there (I won&#8217;t publish the contact details comment)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Chris- great insight. My company will be releasing a product in Q1 that addresses much of the middleware functionality you&#039;ve proposed. In terms of the interface, we&#039;ve chosen iSCSI. I&#039;d be happy to share more on one-off basis, or discuss beta testing CloudArray when it&#039;s avaialble.&lt;br/&gt;Craig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris- great insight. My company will be releasing a product in Q1 that addresses much of the middleware functionality you&#8217;ve proposed. In terms of the interface, we&#8217;ve chosen iSCSI. I&#8217;d be happy to share more on one-off basis, or discuss beta testing CloudArray when it&#8217;s avaialble.<br />Craig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M Evans</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-515</guid>
		<description>Thanks Taylor!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I agree with the tiering issue; it is possible to make Cloud another tier.  Question is, how to seamlessly access it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Taylor!</p>
<p>I agree with the tiering issue; it is possible to make Cloud another tier.  Question is, how to seamlessly access it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Allis</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Allis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/redundant-array-of-inexpensive-clouds-pt-ii/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Chris - wow, RAIC - great, original thought.  I think there is a great middleware opportunity here. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Another way to look at cloud storage is another tier of storage with a very low $/GB - in thinking about it this way, RAIC is a great idea. However, one of the reasons why some users may want to move to the cloud is b/c they don&#039;t want to deal with RAID levels in the first place.  But if you want reliability and reducdancy out of your cloud storage, then this is the way to do it.  This could be a feature from the cloud providers - if users see that their data is being replicated to different sites behind the cloud then they get relaiblity and ease of use. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have been interested in how SmugMug has leveraged the cloud with S3 - all their data sits there, non-replicated and they use disk in their own data center as hot cache...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; wow, RAIC &#8211; great, original thought.  I think there is a great middleware opportunity here. </p>
<p>Another way to look at cloud storage is another tier of storage with a very low $/GB &#8211; in thinking about it this way, RAIC is a great idea. However, one of the reasons why some users may want to move to the cloud is b/c they don&#8217;t want to deal with RAID levels in the first place.  But if you want reliability and reducdancy out of your cloud storage, then this is the way to do it.  This could be a feature from the cloud providers &#8211; if users see that their data is being replicated to different sites behind the cloud then they get relaiblity and ease of use. </p>
<p>I have been interested in how SmugMug has leveraged the cloud with S3 &#8211; all their data sits there, non-replicated and they use disk in their own data center as hot cache&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

