<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise Computing: DMX-4 Is Dead &#8211; Long Live DMX-5!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/</link>
	<description>Storage, Virtualisation &#38; Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:47:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Asaro&#8217;s Blog Bytes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; External Blog Posts You Should Read</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Asaro&#8217;s Blog Bytes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; External Blog Posts You Should Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=316#comment-584</guid>
		<description>[...] DMX4 is Dead - Long Live DMX 5 - by the Storage Architect, Chris Evans [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DMX4 is Dead &#8211; Long Live DMX 5 &#8211; by the Storage Architect, Chris Evans [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storagezilla</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Storagezilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=316#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Techmute: Virtual Provisioning is priced comparable to that of the Thin Provisioning offerings from DMX competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techmute: Virtual Provisioning is priced comparable to that of the Thin Provisioning offerings from DMX competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=316#comment-582</guid>
		<description>May be you should alter the pic to strike out the EMC and replace it with &quot;Cisco&quot; -

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/ciscos-cash-hoard-swells-alongside-acquistion-rumors/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be you should alter the pic to strike out the EMC and replace it with &#8220;Cisco&#8221; -</p>
<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/ciscos-cash-hoard-swells-alongside-acquistion-rumors/"  rel="nofollow">http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/ciscos-cash-hoard-swells-alongside-acquistion-rumors/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinetica Blog » Un 2009 Di Aspettative!</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinetica Blog » Un 2009 Di Aspettative!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=316#comment-581</guid>
		<description>[...] ultimi giorni ho letto più volte ( qui e qui ) delle aspettative riguardanti il prossimo (sperato!) lancio della nuova serie DMX di [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ultimi giorni ho letto più volte ( qui e qui ) delle aspettative riguardanti il prossimo (sperato!) lancio della nuova serie DMX di [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techmute</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Techmute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=316#comment-580</guid>
		<description>@zilla - It isn&#039;t that Virtual Provisioning isn&#039;t a great technology, it is more that the license is fairly expensive the last time I checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@zilla &#8211; It isn&#8217;t that Virtual Provisioning isn&#8217;t a great technology, it is more that the license is fairly expensive the last time I checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storagezilla</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Storagezilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=316#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Virtual Provisioning solves a lot of that today. Engineering ran session on it at EMC World 08 as to why DMX customers should be using it right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtual Provisioning solves a lot of that today. Engineering ran session on it at EMC World 08 as to why DMX customers should be using it right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Evans</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=316#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Stephen, I guess so.  Thing is, as we all know, HDDs are more and more reliable, so mid-range devices like 3Par are making hay while the sun shines.  EMC know that because they claim 5-nines availability for Clariion.

Why pay for DMX-level quality, when other technology out there does the job at half the price?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, I guess so.  Thing is, as we all know, HDDs are more and more reliable, so mid-range devices like 3Par are making hay while the sun shines.  EMC know that because they claim 5-nines availability for Clariion.</p>
<p>Why pay for DMX-level quality, when other technology out there does the job at half the price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Foskett</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/02/09/enterprise-computing-dmx-4-is-dead-long-live-dmx-5/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Foskett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=316#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Yes, Chris, having a DMX that was as flexible and granular as the competition in terms of wide striping, mirroring, and replication would be a Very Good Thing. Moshe&#039;s Symmetrix was brilliant, but its time has passed - even he has moved on. Let&#039;s get rid of mirror positions and metas once and for all!

But I&#039;m betting that DMX-5 will be much more evolutionary than revolutionary...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Chris, having a DMX that was as flexible and granular as the competition in terms of wide striping, mirroring, and replication would be a Very Good Thing. Moshe&#8217;s Symmetrix was brilliant, but its time has passed &#8211; even he has moved on. Let&#8217;s get rid of mirror positions and metas once and for all!</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m betting that DMX-5 will be much more evolutionary than revolutionary&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

