Enterprise Computing: Flash – What We Really Need
Storagebod had a great comment on the use of Flash Drives in Enterprise arrays. I’d agree entirely that the vendors have bolted them into existing hardware and as a consequence they’re not working to their most efficient.
Here’s a prediction – an array which works on fixed “memory”pages that can be placed in cache, SSD, or any level of internal HDD – and offer seamless movement of data up and down this performance stack will let that vendor clean up in the Enterprise Array market. At that point, the additional cost for Flash Drives will be worth it, as the hardware can be fully utilised and the cost justified.
So will that be the DMX-5, or DMX-V or whatever the next DMX is to be called? In some respects I hope so. Enterprise computing needs a real shake up.
P.S. Posts will be infrequent, of lower quality or non-existent whilst I’m on holiday.
5 Responses to Enterprise Computing: Flash – What We Really Need
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Popular Posts
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (5,776)
- Back to Blogging (3,808)
- The technical solution is not always the best (3,339)
- Enterprise Computing: Why Thin Provisioning Is Not The Holy Grail for Utilisation (3,017)
- Data ONTAP 8.0 – Part III (2,974)
- Comparing iSCSI Targets – Microsoft, StarWind, iSCSI Cake and Kernsafe – Part I (2,500)
- Solid State Arrays: Pure Storage Inc (2,428)
- EMC Releases All Flash VNX (2,305)
- Review: Compellent Storage Center – Part II (2,180)
- Who Will Be The First Solid State Array Vendor To Be Acquired? (2,027)








Have you checked out the new “Open Storage” from Sun? The higher end 7410 pretty much does as you say. ZFS stages the first level in memory, writes off to optimised SSD via the ZIL as a second layer and then off to 3rd level disk at a leisurely pace.
Reading data is the same maximising what’s in the memory and SSD read cache via the L2ARC architecture. I’m seeing some pretty good numbers out of it.
Cheers, Rob.
@Rob
The interesting thing is, that EMC and Netapp are so quiet about Sun’s Amber Road offering.
But I’m certain the usual FUD will soon start.
For our next project I certainly will do a trial on these boxes.
I’m really pissed, that our EMC storage expansion budget for 2009 is already used, without getting a single GB of storage (sudden performance issues made us buy cache etc…).
For the same amount of money we spent, I could already have gotten four 7410′s
I’m looking to re-architect a SAN with an intelligent storage that does block level tiering. A vendor that does this natively is Compellent and I think NetApp has an interesting twist on this with their Flash Cache accelerator which uses SSD as level 2 cache instead of traditional disk. Haven’t looked at SUN, but it’s definitely worth a look. Any other suggestions?
Watch this space – I have things planned over the next couple of months.
Dan
Not a lot out there doing block-level tiering other than those you’ve mentioned. What’s your overall goal? Better performance? Cheaper hardware? It may be you can solve your problem in other ways.
Chris