<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System &#8211; Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/06/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/06/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Storage, Virtualisation &#38; Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Evans</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/06/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-ii/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=537#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Deepak

I&#039;ve not deployed Exchange 2007 on the USS, however I can confirm that it supports iSCSI block-based I/O, not just CIFS/NFS.  Effectively this would have the same issues as your FC device if a system crash occurred.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deepak</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not deployed Exchange 2007 on the USS, however I can confirm that it supports iSCSI block-based I/O, not just CIFS/NFS.  Effectively this would have the same issues as your FC device if a system crash occurred.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System &#8211; Part III &#171; The Storage Architect</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/06/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-ii/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System &#8211; Part III &#171; The Storage Architect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=537#comment-769</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Not The Holy Grail for UtilisationPersonal Computing: Diagnosing Performance ProblemsReview: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System - Part IIReview: OCZ SSD - Solid State DiskVote For Me With The Storage Monkeys!Enterprise Computing: Data [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Not The Holy Grail for UtilisationPersonal Computing: Diagnosing Performance ProblemsReview: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System &#8211; Part IIReview: OCZ SSD &#8211; Solid State DiskVote For Me With The Storage Monkeys!Enterprise Computing: Data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/06/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-ii/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=537#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Hi Folks,

 Sun 7000 serious is no doubt robust and multi platform based... but can you throw some light on my query..

 How reliable will this be a solution with MS Exchange 2007?
Data on FC disks use block level storage.. so how will be the data more reliable preseving integrity? I mean I havea storage pool but the base is through a File system... so what if the file system crashes/corrupts or the OS corrupts??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Folks,</p>
<p> Sun 7000 serious is no doubt robust and multi platform based&#8230; but can you throw some light on my query..</p>
<p> How reliable will this be a solution with MS Exchange 2007?<br />
Data on FC disks use block level storage.. so how will be the data more reliable preseving integrity? I mean I havea storage pool but the base is through a File system&#8230; so what if the file system crashes/corrupts or the OS corrupts??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Storage Architect&#8217;s Amber Road Review &#8212; Part II - Technology</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/06/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-ii/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>The Storage Architect&#8217;s Amber Road Review &#8212; Part II - Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=537#comment-766</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Evans of The Storage Architect blog took another in-depth look at the Amber Road platform. In this post, he turned his sights on the disk components of the hardware, specifically looking at the use of [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Evans of The Storage Architect blog took another in-depth look at the Amber Road platform. In this post, he turned his sights on the disk components of the hardware, specifically looking at the use of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

