<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise Computing: The New USP &#8211; A Dreary Storage Cluster?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/</link>
	<description>Storage, Virtualisation &#38; Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Taste Of HAM (Apologies To The Doctor) &#8211; Gestalt IT</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>A Taste Of HAM (Apologies To The Doctor) &#8211; Gestalt IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-824</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d like to know &#8217;bout HDS HAM/What is it, oh HDS [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d like to know &#8217;bout HDS HAM/What is it, oh HDS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDS&#8217; HAM-Fisted Announcement Can&#8217;t Be All &#8211; Gestalt IT</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>HDS&#8217; HAM-Fisted Announcement Can&#8217;t Be All &#8211; Gestalt IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-823</guid>
		<description>[...] was coming today. They even made it fun, with a (literally) cryptic blog entry to make sure we were all watching. But the announcement of High Availability Manager, a software product to manage existing HDS USP-V [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was coming today. They even made it fun, with a (literally) cryptic blog entry to make sure we were all watching. But the announcement of High Availability Manager, a software product to manage existing HDS USP-V [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Evans</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-822</guid>
		<description>Soikki,

Thanks for the tip, I&#039;ll have a look.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soikki,</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip, I&#8217;ll have a look.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soikki</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>soikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Have you not noticed that V-Max&#039;s &quot;tiering&quot; seems to be flawed: you cannot migrate data even between &quot;normal&quot; volumes and dp-volumes in the same array... Not to even talk about migrating data between different arrays. Also, the box is locked for a while when you want to migrate data (in several occasions). Read emc&#039;s whitepaper &quot;Best practices for nondisruptive tiering via emc symmetrix virtual lun&quot; and tell me if the above is true or not.

Isn&#039;t this a bigger problem with tiering, than the fact that in v-max you can currently have bigger ssd&#039;s? And with current FAST, I don&#039;t see anything dynamic about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you not noticed that V-Max&#8217;s &#8220;tiering&#8221; seems to be flawed: you cannot migrate data even between &#8220;normal&#8221; volumes and dp-volumes in the same array&#8230; Not to even talk about migrating data between different arrays. Also, the box is locked for a while when you want to migrate data (in several occasions). Read emc&#8217;s whitepaper &#8220;Best practices for nondisruptive tiering via emc symmetrix virtual lun&#8221; and tell me if the above is true or not.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this a bigger problem with tiering, than the fact that in v-max you can currently have bigger ssd&#8217;s? And with current FAST, I don&#8217;t see anything dynamic about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Evans</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-820</guid>
		<description>I think there will be two versions - FAST for LUNs - which will be akin to Optimiser of today and similar to what Tiered Storage Manager can offer.  Next year (2010 some time) EMC will bring FAST for blocks - so individual blocks of a LUN can be moved between tiers.  That&#039;s the real killer app...

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there will be two versions &#8211; FAST for LUNs &#8211; which will be akin to Optimiser of today and similar to what Tiered Storage Manager can offer.  Next year (2010 some time) EMC will bring FAST for blocks &#8211; so individual blocks of a LUN can be moved between tiers.  That&#8217;s the real killer app&#8230;</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regrades Our Classy Treat &#171; Work In Progress</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Regrades Our Classy Treat &#171; Work In Progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-819</guid>
		<description>[...] Evans claims (http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-...)  that “Regrades Our Classy Treat” is an anagram of “A Dreary Storage Cluster”. This is [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Evans claims (<a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-.."  rel="nofollow">http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-..</a>.)  that “Regrades Our Classy Treat” is an anagram of “A Dreary Storage Cluster”. This is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDS&#8217;s anagrammatic announcement - Storage Soup</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>HDS&#8217;s anagrammatic announcement - Storage Soup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-818</guid>
		<description>[...] storage consultant Chris M. Evans solved the puzzle on his blog with STORAGE ARRAYS CLUSTERED or CLUSTERED STORAGE [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] storage consultant Chris M. Evans solved the puzzle on his blog with STORAGE ARRAYS CLUSTERED or CLUSTERED STORAGE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Ho</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 01:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Does V-max FAST work similarly as USP-V&#039;s Tiered Storage Manager?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does V-max FAST work similarly as USP-V&#8217;s Tiered Storage Manager?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Evans</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-816</guid>
		<description>USP-V Max it is!  :-)

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USP-V Max it is!  <img src='http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-computing-the-new-usp-scabetera-dreary-storage-cluster/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=579#comment-815</guid>
		<description>How about USP V-max :-P

Based on the DLB thing at http://bit.ly/189Uzc (I assume Dynamic Load Balance), I&#039;d always thought it would be USP V DLB.  Let hope thats just the factory name though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about USP V-max <img src='http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Based on the DLB thing at <a href="http://bit.ly/189Uzc"  rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/189Uzc</a> (I assume Dynamic Load Balance), I&#8217;d always thought it would be USP V DLB.  Let hope thats just the factory name though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

