Enterprise Computing: When Latency Doesn’t Count
A quick exchange tonight on Twitter with Steve Duplessie (@stevedupe) regarding latency and datacentre location got me thinking again about the whole datacentre location issue which I’d mused over some time ago.
It goes like this; given no latency restrictions, where in the world would you place your datacentres?
Clearly the choice would be based on a number of parameters:
- ready availability of (cheap) power (i.e. electricity)
- low cooling costs (Death Valley would probably be unsuitable)
- geographic stability (no earthquakes please)
- political stability (nobody reclaiming my datacentre as their property)
- Cheap land and build costs
- access to cheap and skilled labour to run the operation
It isn’t difficult to extrapolate these points and come up with a number of locations on the globe that would fit this criteria. Companies are already doing it, so how hard is the latency problem?
Firstly, we should ask where exactly does the latency occur? With decent telecomms, customer->server latency isn’t much of an issue, especially if the communication is web based. From a storage perspective, what’s more difficult is providing application/data resiliency in geographically disparate locations. We know about technologies like Axxana that can assist in the distance replication problem, and having an application->storage understanding helps design infrastructures that can provide simultaneous diverse access to data.
Perhaps the age of datacentres located wherever we choose isn’t that far away after all…
3 Responses to Enterprise Computing: When Latency Doesn’t Count
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
- Use Symantec and know your sensitive data is protected with industry-leading backup & recovery software.
Experience Symantec Backup Software
Popular Posts
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (3816)
- Back to Blogging (2312)
- The technical solution is not always the best (2019)
- Data ONTAP 8.0 – Part III (1828)
- Solid State Arrays: Pure Storage Inc (1776)
- EMC Releases All Flash VNX (1759)
- Enterprise Computing: Why Thin Provisioning Is Not The Holy Grail for Utilisation (1551)
- Who Will Be The First Solid State Array Vendor To Be Acquired? (1515)
- Drive Prices Increase – Who Will Suffer Most? (1449)
- VAAI Follow Up – VMware Recommend Disabling Thin Reclaim (1357)








Oddly enough, Sun’s cloud data center (SuperNAP) is situated just outside of Las Vegas. Meets most of your criteria, except it is arguably in a (near) desert area:
http://blogs.sun.com/HPC/entry/video_tour_the_sun_cloud
I guess desert is possibly acceptable if the cooling issue can be managed (which I’m sure it can).
Chris
When harnessing solar power becomes more efficient then deserts, with their heat and cheap land will look very attractive.
A while ago I worked for a company that had a Data Centre in a far out place. Ticked most of the boxes you suggest. We had an interesting problem though when we lost access via the main IPLC. Took us 3 days to work out that the ocean bed cable had been damaged during an earthquate not far from Albania (if memory serves). Stretching cables around the globe nad under the sea and the likes can make for interesting challenges