VMware vs. Microsoft Virtualization: Is Hyper-V “Good Enough”?
In the world of x86 server virtualization, there’s no doubt that VMware’s vSphere dominates. This 2010 IDC virtualization report shows VMware as the only company in the upper right segment of Gartner’s Magic Quadrant.
However Citrix (with Xen Server) and Microsoft (with Hyper-V) are close behind. So, could the Microsoft solution be “good enough” for organizations that don’t want to follow the VMware path?
Read the remainder of this post at datamation…
One Response to VMware vs. Microsoft Virtualization: Is Hyper-V “Good Enough”?
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Popular Posts
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (5,736)
- Back to Blogging (3,754)
- The technical solution is not always the best (3,295)
- Enterprise Computing: Why Thin Provisioning Is Not The Holy Grail for Utilisation (2,980)
- Data ONTAP 8.0 – Part III (2,947)
- Comparing iSCSI Targets – Microsoft, StarWind, iSCSI Cake and Kernsafe – Part I (2,460)
- Solid State Arrays: Pure Storage Inc (2,422)
- EMC Releases All Flash VNX (2,300)
- Review: Compellent Storage Center – Part II (2,161)
- Who Will Be The First Solid State Array Vendor To Be Acquired? (2,016)








[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris M Evans, Chris M Evans. Chris M Evans said: [blog] VMware vs. Microsoft Virtualization: Is Hyper-V “Good Enough”?: In the world of x86 server virtua… http://bit.ly/fU95ok [...]