<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Storage Architect &#187; aperi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/tag/aperi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com</link>
	<description>Storage, Virtualisation &#38; Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Storage Management: Aperi &#8211; It&#8217;s all over</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/01/28/storage-management-aperi-its-all-over/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/01/28/storage-management-aperi-its-all-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aperi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open storage management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/storage-management-aperi-its-all-over/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_b1B7GuxiR0o/SYBowodEORI/AAAAAAAAAOA/uFlg0DYIC9Q/s1600-h/aperi+logo.jpg" ></a>It looks like the open storage management project Aperi has finally been put to rest. See this <a href="http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aperi-news/msg00097.html" >link</a>. <p> Storage Resource Management is in a woeful state. SNIA with their SMI-S initiative have failed to deliver anything of value. I&#8217;ve posted multiple times <a rel="nofollow" href="http://storagearchitect.blogspot.com/2008/12/srm-conundrum.html" >here</a> and <a rel="nofollow" [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_b1B7GuxiR0o/SYBowodEORI/AAAAAAAAAOA/uFlg0DYIC9Q/s1600-h/aperi+logo.jpg" ><img style="float:left;width:84px;cursor:hand;height:61px;margin:0 10px 10px 0;" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_b1B7GuxiR0o/SYBowodEORI/AAAAAAAAAOA/uFlg0DYIC9Q/s320/aperi+logo.jpg" border="0" /></a>It looks like the open storage management project Aperi has finally been put to rest. See this <a href="http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aperi-news/msg00097.html" >link</a>.
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
<p>
<div>Storage Resource Management is in a woeful state. SNIA with their SMI-S initiative have failed to deliver anything of value. I&#8217;ve posted multiple times <a rel="nofollow" href="http://storagearchitect.blogspot.com/2008/12/srm-conundrum.html" >here</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://storagearchitect.blogspot.com/2008/10/smi-s-is-dead.html" >here</a> about how bad things are. I&#8217;m not the only one: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://storagebod.typepad.com/storagebods_blog/2008/12/extreme-cash-cow-totally-pointless-console-etc.html" >Martin&#8217;s Recent Post</a> discussed it; if I could be bothered I&#8217;m sure I could find more!</div>
<div></div>
<p>
<div><a rel="nofollow" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_b1B7GuxiR0o/SYBsvtvXMdI/AAAAAAAAAOQ/BXDNwvQTSfw/s1600-h/logo_small.jpg" ><img style="float:right;width:100px;cursor:hand;height:29px;margin:0 0 10px 10px;" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_b1B7GuxiR0o/SYBsvtvXMdI/AAAAAAAAAOQ/BXDNwvQTSfw/s320/logo_small.jpg" border="0" /></a>Previously I&#8217;ve discussed writing SRM software and I&#8217;ve done just that with a company I&#8217;ve been working with for some months: <a href="http://www.storagefusion.com/" >http://www.storagefusion.com/</a>. Whilst this might be a shameless plug, I can honestly say that as a product (in the reporting space at least) SRA will harmonise storage reporting more than anything else out there today. Here&#8217;s why:</div>
<div></div>
<ol>
<li>It doesn&#8217;t rely on generic standards for reporting, but gets the full detail on each platform.</li>
<li>It uses element managers or management console/CLIs to retrieve data.</li>
<li>It doesn&#8217;t need additional servers or effort to deploy or manage.</li>
<li>It normalises all data to provide a simple consistent framework for capacity reporting.</li>
</ol>
<p>Now reporting is good, but management is hard by comparison. Reporting on hardware doesn&#8217;t necessarily break it &#8211; SRM software which changes the array could &#8211; therefore it needs to know exactly how to interact with an array and therefore requires decent API access.</p>
<p>Vendors aren&#8217;t going to give this out to each other, so here&#8217;s a proposal:</p>
<p>Vendors fund a single organisation to develop a unified global SRM tool. They provide API access under licence which doesn&#8217;t permit sharing of that API with competitors. As the product is licensed to end users, each vendor gets paid a fee per array per GB managed so thay have some financial recompense for putting skin into the game.</p>
<p>Anyone interested?</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">
<p>_uacct = &#8220;UA-1104321-2&#8243;;<br />
urchinTracker();
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/01/28/storage-management-aperi-its-all-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

