Word on the street says Drobo are planning a merger with Connected Data, the new company at the heart of the transporter product. Drobo, formerly Data Robotics Inc, makes a range of “storage robots”, devices that need little or no user management and come in [...]
Continue Reading This Post →Reading this recent article on ZDNet I was struck by the pointlessness of Google’s 1TB of user storage offering. This may seem like a bold statement, but let’s look at the figures and the offering. If you buy a Chromebook Pixel, it comes with [...]
Continue Reading This Post →At the end of August 2012, Amazon Web Services released their latest service offering – a long-term archive service called Glacier. As a complement to their existing active data access service S3, Glacier provides long term storage for “cold” data [...]
Continue Reading This Post →This week has seen announcements from two companies I’ve been interested in and following for some time.
Nasuni
Nasuni makes a storage appliance that stores all of a customer’s data in “the cloud”. It’s available either as a physical device (effectively a server running their software) or as a virtual [...]
Continue Reading This Post →Nirvanix is one of the companies at the forefront of offering cloud computing services. Their key products are based around the Nirvanix Storage Delivery Network (SDN); data can be stored and retrieved using a number of client applications, one of which is the Nirvanix CloudNAS product. I’ve been reviewing [...]
Continue Reading This Post →A quick Tweet with Chris Mellor just reminded me of something I touched on a few months ago but always meant to write about in more detail. It’s a semi-serious analogy (it is Friday after all) but there’s a hint of the possible about [...]
Continue Reading This Post →A quick check on Twitter this morning shows me they’re up to message number 1,179,118,180 or just over the 1.1 billion mark. That’s a pretty big number – or so it seems, but in the context of data storage devices, it’s not that big. Let me explain…
Assume Twitter messages [...]
Continue Reading This Post →Subscribe to Architecting IT
Popular Posts
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (10,208)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Storage Spaces (9,661)
- Enterprise Computing: Why Thin Provisioning Is Not The Holy Grail for Utilisation (8,061)
- Comparing iSCSI Targets – Microsoft, StarWind, iSCSI Cake and Kernsafe – Part I (6,024)
- Review: Compellent Storage Center – Part II (5,676)
- Data ONTAP 8.0 – Part III (5,162)
- Why Does Microsoft Hyper-V Not Support NFS? (5,082)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Virtual Fibre Channel (4,533)
- How To: Enable iSNS Server in Windows 2008 (4,526)
- Back to Blogging (4,455)
Daily Popular
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Virtual Fibre Channel (7)
- Rise of The IT Generalist – A Bad Idea? (6)
- Comparing iSCSI Targets – Microsoft, StarWind, iSCSI Cake and Kernsafe – Part I (5)
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (4)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Resilient File System (4)
- HUS VM – Hitachi’s New Midrange Baby (3)
- 3PAR Continues to be HP Storage Cornerstone (3)
- Gartner ECB (External Controller-Based Disk) – 4Q2012 (2)
- VIDEO: Boston Ltd – Igloo SBB Storage Appliance (2)
- Defining Software Defined Storage (2)


