<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Storage Architect &#187; ix4-200d</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/tag/ix4-200d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com</link>
	<description>Storage, Virtualisation &#38; Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualisation: Learning The Hard Way</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2010/01/20/virtualisation-learning-the-hard-way/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2010/01/20/virtualisation-learning-the-hard-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GestaltIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iomega]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ix4-200d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savvio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestoragearchitect.com/?p=1048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>They say that you learn the most when you make mistakes and things go wrong.  Well, last night I certainly must have learned a lot.  What started as a simple physical re-organisation of my hardware turned into a rebuild of my production VMware ESXi server &#8211; finishing at 1am.  Here&#8217;s what happened.</p> Failing Disk <p>I [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say that you learn the most when you make <strong>mistakes</strong> and things go wrong.  Well, last night I certainly must have <strong>learned</strong> a lot.  What started as a simple physical re-organisation of my hardware turned into a rebuild of my production VMware ESXi server &#8211; finishing at 1am.  Here&#8217;s what happened.</p>
<h3>Failing Disk</h3>
<p>I started by shutting down and moving my production ESXi Server out and back into the standard rack it occupies.  On power up, the server failed to reboot, claiming the boot disk was no longer present.  A quick check inside showed that the SAS connector on the boot disk had come loose, so I plugged it back in and tried again (Oh, SAS specification guys &#8211; bad design, no retainers on the plugs).  Unfortunately, the boot disk had somehow become <strong>corrupted</strong> and the server wouldn&#8217;t come up.  No problem, I thought, just repair using the installation media.  This is where things started to get complicated.</p>
<p>My ESXi server runs off a Seagate <strong>Savvio 2.5&#8243; 15K 73GB</strong> drive, one of four Seagate generously loaned me last year for long term testing.  More on that another day.  The server has two disks installed, one of which has VMs on it.  During the repair process I wasn&#8217;t sure which disk was the O/S and which was data.  ESXi doesn&#8217;t help much, only indicating that both disks contained data in partitions, <strong>data that would be lost</strong> if I reinstalled. </p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lesson 1</strong> &#8211; Make sure you know <strong>exactly</strong> how your hardware is configured, down to the SAS ports each drive is plugged into.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually having multiple drives of the same type is a pain.  So rather than risk data loss, I removed both drives and re-installed the ESXi O/S from a third Savvio drive.  All good.  Now I need to locate and import all my VMs, however some were on the removed Savvio disks.  This meant installing each disk independently and checking the contents to determine which contained VMs and which contained the broken O/S.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lesson 2</strong> &#8211; Wherever possible, place your VMs on disks separate from the server itself.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, I do have <strong>most</strong> of my VMs on my Iomega ix4-200d, but, rather crucially, <strong>not</strong> my Windows 2008 AD Server, which needed to be moved from internal disk to the ix4 before I continued (schoolboy error there).  The AD server was rather important for accessing my, ahem, ix4, which is configured to validate logins using AD.  This creates a bit of a circular reference which could have been a <strong>disaster</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lesson 3</strong> &#8211; Place your Windows domain controller on a physical server, or have another independent backup elsewhere.</p></blockquote>
<p>Having a physical server just for AD control isn&#8217;t part of my total virtualisation plan, so I&#8217;m looking at whether I can host a backup controller with <strong>Amazon AWS</strong> and use VPN to secure it into my private network.  This way, if I ever have an issue, I can still authenticate.  The issue of course is <strong>cost</strong>, which may make a dedicated server the cheaper option.</p>
<p>So, by <strong>1am</strong> everything was back up and running.  Did I learn anything else?  Well yes&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lesson 4</strong> &#8211; after 22 years in IT, I should remember that adequate documentation and a DR plan are <strong>crucial</strong>.  In fact, in a virtualised environment, they are essential due to the concentration of risk placing all systems on a single server causes.</p></blockquote>
<p>So what next for my virtual infrastructure?  I have a few changes planned; I&#8217;ll create a backup ESXi server that can import and run the VMs in the event of a future server failure.  I will also be investigating AWS with Windows 2008 and VPN to create a backup domain controller and see if I can continue to work if both server&#8217;s hardware failed.</p>
<p>That leaves one Single Point of Failure&#8230; my ix4-200d.  Anyone want to donate me a spare one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2010/01/20/virtualisation-learning-the-hard-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESXi: Learning The Hard Way</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2010/01/20/virtualisation-learning-the-hard-way-2/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2010/01/20/virtualisation-learning-the-hard-way-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iomega]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ix4-200d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savvio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestoragearchitect.com/?p=1048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>They say that you learn the most when you make mistakes and things go wrong.  Well, last night I certainly must have learned a lot.  What started as a simple physical re-organisation of my hardware turned into a rebuild of my production VMware ESXi server &#8211; finishing at 1am.  Here&#8217;s what happened.</p> Failing Disk <p>I [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say that you learn the most when you make <strong>mistakes</strong> and things go wrong.  Well, last night I certainly must have <strong>learned</strong> a lot.  What started as a simple physical re-organisation of my hardware turned into a rebuild of my production VMware ESXi server &#8211; finishing at 1am.  Here&#8217;s what happened.</p>
<h3>Failing Disk</h3>
<p>I started by shutting down and moving my production ESXi Server out and back into the standard rack it occupies.  On power up, the server failed to reboot, claiming the boot disk was no longer present.  A quick check inside showed that the SAS connector on the boot disk had come loose, so I plugged it back in and tried again (Oh, SAS specification guys &#8211; bad design, no retainers on the plugs).  Unfortunately, the boot disk had somehow become <strong>corrupted</strong> and the server wouldn&#8217;t come up.  No problem, I thought, just repair using the installation media.  This is where things started to get complicated.</p>
<p>My ESXi server runs off a Seagate <strong>Savvio 2.5&#8243; 15K 73GB</strong> drive, one of four Seagate generously loaned me last year for long term testing.  More on that another day.  The server has two disks installed, one of which has VMs on it.  During the repair process I wasn&#8217;t sure which disk was the O/S and which was data.  ESXi doesn&#8217;t help much, only indicating that both disks contained data in partitions, <strong>data that would be lost</strong> if I reinstalled.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lesson 1</strong> &#8211; Make sure you know <strong>exactly</strong> how your hardware is configured, down to the SAS ports each drive is plugged into.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually having multiple drives of the same type is a pain.  So rather than risk data loss, I removed both drives and re-installed the ESXi O/S from a third Savvio drive.  All good.  Now I need to locate and import all my VMs, however some were on the removed Savvio disks.  This meant installing each disk independently and checking the contents to determine which contained VMs and which contained the broken O/S.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lesson 2</strong> &#8211; Wherever possible, place your VMs on disks separate from the server itself.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, I do have <strong>most</strong> of my VMs on my Iomega ix4-200d, but, rather crucially, <strong>not</strong> my Windows 2008 AD Server, which needed to be moved from internal disk to the ix4 before I continued (schoolboy error there).  The AD server was rather important for accessing my, ahem, ix4, which is configured to validate logins using AD.  This creates a bit of a circular reference which could have been a <strong>disaster</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lesson 3</strong> &#8211; Place your Windows domain controller on a physical server, or have another independent backup elsewhere.</p></blockquote>
<p>Having a physical server just for AD control isn&#8217;t part of my total virtualisation plan, so I&#8217;m looking at whether I can host a backup controller with <strong>Amazon AWS</strong> and use VPN to secure it into my private network.  This way, if I ever have an issue, I can still authenticate.  The issue of course is <strong>cost</strong>, which may make a dedicated server the cheaper option.</p>
<p>So, by <strong>1am</strong> everything was back up and running.  Did I learn anything else?  Well yes&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lesson 4</strong> &#8211; after 22 years in IT, I should remember that adequate documentation and a DR plan are <strong>crucial</strong>.  In fact, in a virtualised environment, they are essential due to the concentration of risk placing all systems on a single server causes.</p></blockquote>
<p>So what next for my virtual infrastructure?  I have a few changes planned; I&#8217;ll create a backup ESXi server that can import and run the VMs in the event of a future server failure.  I will also be investigating AWS with Windows 2008 and VPN to create a backup domain controller and see if I can continue to work if both server&#8217;s hardware failed.</p>
<p>That leaves one Single Point of Failure&#8230; my ix4-200d.  Anyone want to donate me a spare one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2010/01/20/virtualisation-learning-the-hard-way-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: DroboPro &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/12/07/review-drobopro-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/12/07/review-drobopro-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GestaltIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drobo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DroboPro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ix4-200d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is the second in a series of posts looking at the DroboPro from Data Robotics Inc.  Previous post(s):</p> <p><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/12/01/review-drobopro-part-i/" >Review: DroboPro &#8211; Part I</a></p> <p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://thestoragearchitect.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/droboesxiscsi.png" ></a>Previously I discussed a few frustrations with connecting my new DroboPro to ESXi, the target environment for my new device.  I&#8217;ve now managed to get the [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second in a series of posts looking at the DroboPro from Data Robotics Inc.  Previous post(s):</p>
<p><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/12/01/review-drobopro-part-i/" >Review: DroboPro &#8211; Part I</a></p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://thestoragearchitect.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/droboesxiscsi.png" ><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-928" title="DroboESXISCSI" src="http://thestoragearchitect.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/droboesxiscsi.png?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="100" /></a>Previously I discussed a few frustrations with connecting my new DroboPro to ESXi, the target environment for my new device.  I&#8217;ve now managed to get the &#8216;Pro connected and visible within ESXi.  See the attached screenshot image taken from my production ESXi server.</p>
<p>So far, I&#8217;ve configured eight 2TB LUNs (although the DroboPro itself only has a capacity of 5TB, 2x 2TB and a single 1TB drive) which are numbered 0-7; the LUN column on the screenshot.  Compare this to the LUNs presented from my ix4-200d, which has three LUNs all numbered &#8217;0&#8242;.  The difference is in the way the DroboPro is choosing to present iSCSI devices and the Runtime Name column gives a clue.  In standard Controller/Target/LUN or CxTyLz/CxTyDz methodology, the ix4 disks are using separate targets to map out each iSCSI LUN, with the LUN number always &#8217;0&#8242;.  The Target setting is analagous to a storage port, typically a physical port on large fibre channel arrays.  The LUNs are then numbered on that port.  The DroboPro presents all its iSCSI LUNs on the same target (in this instance number 3) and so the LUNs are numbered from 0.</p>
<p>This method of presentation doesn&#8217;t necessarily cause a problem, but is just a different way of presenting the LUNs.  Presumably with the Drobo Elite the multi-user functionality is achieved by enabling multiple targets per Drobo, each mapped to a separate user.  In any case, I now have visibility of my DroboPro within ESXi.  Time, to write some data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/12/07/review-drobopro-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise Computing: Is iSCSI The New Home Protocol?</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/11/26/enterprise-computing-is-iscsi-the-new-home-protocol/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/11/26/enterprise-computing-is-iscsi-the-new-home-protocol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GestaltIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DroboPro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iomega]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ix4-200d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to think I&#8217;ve visited a lot of customer sites over the years.  Admittedly most of these are &#8220;enterprise&#8221; class with multi-terabyte if not petabyte quantities of storage.  None of those customers have ever bothered deploying iSCSI as their storage protocol.  Invariably block storage has been implemented using fibre channel and file using CFS [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to think I&#8217;ve visited a lot of customer sites over the years.  Admittedly most of these are &#8220;enterprise&#8221; class with multi-terabyte if not <strong>petabyte</strong> quantities of storage.  None of those customers have ever bothered deploying<strong> iSCSI</strong> as their storage protocol.  Invariably block storage has been implemented using fibre channel and file using CFS or NFS.  Somehow iSCSI just doesn&#8217;t seem to figure.  I have a few thoughts on why&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Network versus Storage.</strong>  There&#8217;s no doubt, Network and Storage teams get on about as well as <strong>cats</strong> and <strong>dogs</strong>.  Although both support networking technologies, they are implemented fundamentally differently.  In fact the only organisation I&#8217;ve seen that had the Network team managing fibre channel had implemented it like an IP network and it was a mess.  As the iSCSI protocol means handing control of the physical transport layer to the network team, then the simpler option is to avoid using iSCSI in the first place.</li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s Too Easy.</strong>  This may seem like a contradiction, but running a fibre channel network usually means managing a controlled environment.  Nobody connects without <strong>permission</strong>, nobody gets access without being zoned in.  Implementing iSCSI is simple and so inherently means less control.</li>
<li><strong>There are no Standards.</strong>  Fibre channel networks are great because you have to use <strong>expensive</strong> components and match everything against approved matrices or you don&#8217;t get support.  iSCSI can be implemented using the <strong>cheapest</strong> NIC and virtual iSCSI targets.  However, this ease of use also means there&#8217;s no vendor certification in the way there is with fibre channel.  Who are you going to blame when things go wrong?</li>
<li><strong>FCoE will Rule The World.</strong>  Yes, Fibre Channel over Ethernet will be the One Storage Protocol to Rule Them All and replace fibre channel, iSCSI, AoE, NFS, CIFS, and any other protocol you care to name.  OK, I&#8217;m being slightly sarcastic, but FCoE is set to harmonise the physical connect, leaving iSCSI redundant.</li>
</ul>
<p>So what&#8217;s the future for iSCSI?  We&#8217;ve seen the rise in popularity of home storage devices in recent years (think Iomega and Drobo).  We&#8217;re now seeing these devices sporting Ethernet connectivity that supports iSCSI.  With iSCSI Initiators (like the one in Windows) being totally ubiquitous, it&#8217;s a no-brainer to deploy iSCSI in home and small office environments.  Maybe there is still a future for iSCSI after all in providing low-cost block storage for the consumer masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/11/26/enterprise-computing-is-iscsi-the-new-home-protocol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal Computing: Drobo Weirdness</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/10/19/personal-computing-drobo-weirdness/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/10/19/personal-computing-drobo-weirdness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drobo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iomega]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ix4-200d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;ve found a small bug with my Drobo which is making me slightly nervous.  Have a look at the first graphic.  I&#8217;ve exceeded a single 2TB logical drive in terms of capacity (as I now have two 2TB and two 1TB physical drives installed).  In this instance the Drobo has created me a second logical drive, which [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;ve found a small bug with my Drobo which is making me slightly nervous.  Have a look at the first graphic.  I&#8217;ve exceeded a single 2TB logical drive in terms of capacity (as I now have two 2TB and two 1TB physical drives installed).  In this instance the Drobo has created me a second logical drive, which I believe I&#8217;ve relabelled as the W: drive.</p>
<p>Unfortunately it&#8217;s not accessible and requires formatting, which also doesn&#8217;t work.  You can see from the additional screens that the Drobo is getting confused on a rename and won&#8217;t let me change the drive details.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the process of getting up to the latest level of code, as it appears I&#8217;m a few steps behind.  I&#8217;m also offloading the data on the Drobo to my new Iomega ix4-200d.  This will hold most of my VMware data, however as it supports Active Directory, I&#8217;m moving my general file shares there too.</p>
<p>Fingers crossed that the code update fixes the problem&#8230;</p>

<a href='http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/10/19/personal-computing-drobo-weirdness/drobowierd2/' title='DroboWierd2'><img width="150" height="97" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/drobowierd2.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DroboWierd2" title="DroboWierd2" /></a>
<a href='http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/10/19/personal-computing-drobo-weirdness/drobowierd3/' title='DroboWierd3'><img width="150" height="126" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/drobowierd3.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DroboWierd3" title="DroboWierd3" /></a>
<a href='http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/10/19/personal-computing-drobo-weirdness/drobowierd1/' title='DroboWierd1'><img width="150" height="111" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/drobowierd1.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="DroboWierd1" title="DroboWierd1" /></a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/10/19/personal-computing-drobo-weirdness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

