<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Storage Architect &#187; simulator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/tag/simulator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com</link>
	<description>Storage, Virtualisation &#38; Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System &#8211; Part IV</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/12/10/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-iv/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/12/10/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-iv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GestaltIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7000 Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is the last in a four-part series of posts on the Sun Storage 7000 USS storage arrays.  Previous posts in this series can be found here:</p> <p><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/04/28/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-i/" title="Permanent Link to Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System – Part I" rel="bookmark" >Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System – Part I</a></p> <p><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/06/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-ii/" title="Permanent Link to [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the last in a four-part series of posts on the Sun Storage 7000 USS storage arrays.  Previous posts in this series can be found here:</p>
<p><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/04/28/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-i/" title="Permanent Link to Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System – Part I" rel="bookmark" >Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System – Part I</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/06/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-ii/" title="Permanent Link to Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System – Part II" rel="bookmark" >Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System – Part II</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/08/05/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-iii/" title="Permanent Link to Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System – Part II" rel="bookmark" >Review: Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System – Part III</a></p>
<p>Previous posts have discussed the physical hardware and what you can do with it.  Sun also do a simulator version of the 7000 series array, which can be used to evaluate the technology.  The Simulator is available for both VirtualBox and VMware.  I chose the VMware version and deployed it on VMware Fusion on my MacBook.</p>
<p><strong>Installation</strong></p>
<p>The installation process is remarkably simple.  Download and unzip the simulator (<a href="http://www.sun.com/storage/disk_systems/unified_storage/resources.jsp?intcmp=3245" >link here</a>) and for Fusion, simply use File -&gt; Open to open the file &#8220;SunStorage.vmwarevm&#8221;.  The configuration process then asks for some simple details &#8211; IP address, default gateway, password and so on.  Once this is complete, the simulator starts up and can be accessed via the standard web interface on port 215.  I&#8217;ve included a few screenshots at the end of this post that highlight the configuration process.</p>
<p><strong>Configuration</strong></p>
<p>Once logged into the simulator, a disclaimer is presented to the user indicating that this deployment isn&#8217;t for production usage or performance measurement. This is pretty obvious; the simulator shows functionally how things work but will never provide the same performance as a dedicated device.</p>
<p>The simulator provides 15x 2GB drives, which although not &#8216;real&#8217; are more than enough to do evaluation with.  As far as I can tell, the simulator appears to be fully functional.</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>Sun have provided a simulator package that appears to pretty much mirror a real USS 7000 array.  Having a fully functional system like this enables new users to gain confidence with it; although not much training is needed, making the mistakes on a simulator is much more preferable to making them on the real thing.  In addition, it&#8217;s easy for any potential purchaser to get a real feel for how easy configuring the 7000 Series can be.</p>
<p>The 7000 simulator is probably equal or better than the Netapp simulator, which I&#8217;ve raved (and probably ranted) about many times.  It&#8217;s a shame that Netapp don&#8217;t choose to make their simulator open to all users, but that&#8217;s another discussion entirely.  The Sun 7000 simulator simply rounds out what to me is a great product, offering storage and simplicity in a single device.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Disclaimer: Sun Microsystems provided a USS 7000 series array on loan in order for me to evaluate this technology.  The unit has since been returned.  I have not been paid by Sun to write this series of posts or received any other benefit or inducement of any kind from Sun Microsystems.</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim1.png" ><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-942" title="SunSim1" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim1-150x150.png" alt="SunSim1" width="150" height="150" /></a><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim2.png" ><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-941" title="SunSim2" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim2-150x150.png" alt="SunSim2" width="150" height="150" /></a><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim3.png" ><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-940" title="SunSim3" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim3-150x150.png" alt="SunSim3" width="150" height="150" /></a><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim4.png" ><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-939" title="SunSim4" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim4-150x150.png" alt="SunSim4" width="150" height="150" /></a><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim5.png" ><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-938" title="SunSim5" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim5-150x150.png" alt="SunSim5" width="150" height="150" /></a><a href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim6.png" ><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-937" title="SunSim6" src="http://thestoragearchitect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sunsim6-150x150.png" alt="SunSim6" width="150" height="150" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/12/10/review-sun-storage-7000-unified-storage-system-part-iv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simulator Update</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/04/23/simulator-update/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/04/23/simulator-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simulator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/simulator-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following a few comments on the previous simulator <a rel="nofollow" href="http://storagearchitect.blogspot.com/2007/04/where-are-all-simulators.html" >post</a>, it doesn&#8217;t look like there are any more simulators out there for general use. </p> <p>If anyone does know &#8211; feel free to comment! <p>_uacct = &#8220;UA-1104321-2&#8243;;<br /> urchinTracker(); </p><!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following a few comments on the previous simulator <a rel="nofollow" href="http://storagearchitect.blogspot.com/2007/04/where-are-all-simulators.html" >post</a>, it doesn&#8217;t look like there are any more simulators out there for general use. </p>
<p>If anyone does know &#8211; feel free to comment!
<div class="blogger-post-footer">
<p>_uacct = &#8220;UA-1104321-2&#8243;;<br />
urchinTracker();
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/04/23/simulator-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where are all the simulators</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/04/11/where-are-all-the-simulators/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/04/11/where-are-all-the-simulators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brocade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2007/04/11/where-are-all-the-simulators/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I love the Netapp simulator (well, apart from the annoying issues with creating and deleting disks) and I use it all the time. It is great for testing ideas, testing scripting and generally refreshing knowledge on commands before having to touch real equipment. I use it with VMware (as I have probably mentioned before) and [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the Netapp simulator (well, apart from the annoying issues with creating and deleting disks) and I use it all the time. It is great for testing ideas, testing scripting and generally refreshing knowledge on commands before having to touch real equipment. I use it with VMware (as I have probably mentioned before) and I can knock up a new environment in a few minutes by cloning an existing machine. Netapp have got a huge advantage in offering the tool as it enables customers who can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t put in test equipment to do work and protect their production environments.</p>
<p>So, where are all the other simulators? Is it just that I don&#8217;t know they exist or do most vendors not provide them? For the same reasons as I mentioned above, if there were simulators for EMC DMX, HDS USP, Cisco and Brocade/McDATA switches, then there would be a huge opportunity for people to test and develop scripts, test upgrades and other useful work.</p>
<p>Would anyone else like a simulator? Can the vendors tell me why they don&#8217;t produce them?
<div class="blogger-post-footer">
<p>_uacct = &#8220;UA-1104321-2&#8243;;<br />
urchinTracker();
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/04/11/where-are-all-the-simulators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>more about iSCSI</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/01/14/more-about-iscsi/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/01/14/more-about-iscsi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netapp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/more-about-iscsi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned as a &#8220;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://storagearchitect.blogspot.com/2007/01/storage-resolutions.html" >Storage Resolution</a>&#8221; to look more in-depth at iSCSI. Well I&#8217;ve started doing just that today.</p> <p>The first thing I thought I needed was a working environment. I&#8217;m not keen on investing in an entire storage array (at this stage) to do the testing (unless some *very* generous vendor [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned as a &#8220;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://storagearchitect.blogspot.com/2007/01/storage-resolutions.html" >Storage Resolution</a>&#8221; to look more in-depth at iSCSI. Well I&#8217;ve started doing just that today.</p>
<p>The first thing I thought I needed was a working environment. I&#8217;m not keen on investing in an entire storage array (at this stage) to do the testing (unless some *very* generous vendor out there wants to let me &#8220;loan&#8221; one) so I&#8217;ve build a virtual environment based on a number of free components.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve a dedicated VMware testing machine recently built which has a dual Core Intel processor, 2GB of RAM and a SATA drive. Nice and simple. It runs Win2K3 with the free VMware server, onto which I&#8217;ve created another Win2K3 R2 partition and a Linux partition running Fedora Core 6. This is where my iSCSI &#8220;target&#8221; will sit.</p>
<p>For those unfamiliar with SCSI terminology, the source disk or disk system presents LUNs which are referred to as targets. The host accessing those LUNs is the initiator; simply put the host initiates a connection to a target device, hence the names. My iSCSI target in this instance is a copy of the Netapp simulator running on Linux.</p>
<p>Most people are probably aware of the simulator. If not, Dave Hitz talks about it <a href="http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/TechTalk/2006/11/30/Simulate-NetApp-Storage-on-Linux-My-Boss-Wont-Buy-Hardware-for-Me-to-Play.html" >here</a>. I&#8217;ve created a number of disks into an OnTAP volume and out of that created a LUN. LUNs can be presented out as FC or iSCSI, in this instance I&#8217;ve presented it out as iSCSI.</p>
<p>By default the simulator doesn&#8217;t enable iSCSI so I enabled it with the standard settings. This means my target&#8217;s iSCSI address is all based on Netapp defaults. I&#8217;m going to work on what the best practices should be for these settings over the coming days. Anyway, I&#8217;ve presented 2 LUNs and numbered them LUN 4 and LUN 9.</p>
<p>At the initiator (host) end, I&#8217;ve used my Win2K3 Server and installed the iSCSI initiator software from Microsoft. This gave me a desktop icon to configure the settings. Again, I&#8217;ve ended up with the default names for my iSCSI initiator, but that doesn&#8217;t matter; all I had to do was specify in the iSCSI initiator settings the IP address of my target, log on and it finds the LUNs (oh, one small point, I had to authorise the initiator on the simulator). Voila, I now have 2 disks configured to my Windows host which can be formatted as standard LUNs.</p>
<p>As a performance test, I ran <a href="http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach" >HdTach</a> against the iSCSI LUNs on Win2k3. I got a respectable 45MB/s throughput, which isn&#8217;t bad bearing in mind this environment is all virtual on the same physical machine.</p>
<p>All the above sounds a bit complicated, so I&#8217;ll break it down over the coming days as to what I had to do; I&#8217;ll also explain the iSCSI settings I needed to make and my experiments with dual pathing and taking the iSCSI devices away from Windows in mid-operation.
<div class="blogger-post-footer">
<p>_uacct = &#8220;UA-1104321-2&#8243;;<br />
urchinTracker();
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2007/01/14/more-about-iscsi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

