<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Storage Architect &#187; Storage Configuration Advisor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestoragearchitect.com/tag/storage-configuration-advisor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com</link>
	<description>Storage, Virtualisation &#38; Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise Computing: Is EMC Storage Configuration Advisor A SANScreen Killer?</title>
		<link>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/13/enterprise-computing-is-emc-storage-configuration-advisor-a-sanscreen-killer/</link>
		<comments>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/13/enterprise-computing-is-emc-storage-configuration-advisor-a-sanscreen-killer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris M Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onaro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanscreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Configuration Advisor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>EMC have just announced a new product &#8211; Storage Configuration Advisor (see the press release <a href="http://www.emc.com/about/news/press/2009/20090512-01.htm" >here</a>).  A quick review of the press release and the <a href="http://www.emc.com/collateral/software/data-sheet/h6247-storage-config-ds.pdf" >datasheet</a> shows a remarkable similarity to Netapp&#8217;s <a href="http://www.netapp.com/us/products/management-software/sanscreen/sanscreen.html" >SANScreen</a>.  Both products are pitched as datacentre automation tools &#8211; they monitor your configuration and highlight logical [...]<!--Begin ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.clixtrac.com/rotate/321"></script>
<!--End ClixTrac.com Rotator Code -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMC have just announced a new product &#8211; <strong>Storage Configuration Advisor</strong> (see the press release <a href="http://www.emc.com/about/news/press/2009/20090512-01.htm" >here</a>).  A quick review of the press release and the <a href="http://www.emc.com/collateral/software/data-sheet/h6247-storage-config-ds.pdf" >datasheet</a> shows a remarkable similarity to Netapp&#8217;s <a href="http://www.netapp.com/us/products/management-software/sanscreen/sanscreen.html" >SANScreen</a>.  Both products are pitched as datacentre automation tools &#8211; they monitor your configuration and highlight logical inconsistencies as they occur.  SANScreen has been expanded to include some reporting but essentially the core product has remained the same since the Onaro days.</p>
<p>So, should Netapp be worried?  <strong>I think so.</strong>  EMC have a massive software portfolio and the resources (and desire) to execute on developing and pushing the product into customer sites.  They can easily afford to give the software away as part of a bundled array and switch deal.  On the other hand, Netapp don&#8217;t have a good record on management software.  Could they really afford to give SANScreen away, bearing in mind the product manages hardware that isn&#8217;t their core competency?  Probably not.  </p>
<p>Any SANScreen customers heard from EMC yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thestoragearchitect.com/2009/05/13/enterprise-computing-is-emc-storage-configuration-advisor-a-sanscreen-killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

